Five Hundy by Midnight 126: Heartland Casino Tour by Travel Deals

However, during the second read-through I figured out where he crossed the NOMA line. I just don’t see a logical discontinuity here.

However, biology isn't Penrose's strong suit, so he teamed up with Dr. The mainstream answer is “nature selection did it”. Personally, I think the Truth will be forever unknown and unknowable. Water, she alerted us, is going to be the next big challenge after carbon footprint responsibility takes hold. To inorganic AI machines, it could cause a paradigm shift and probably will.

Personally, I am still holding on to my multiple NOMA Truths that include a purposeless predetermined Universe and an Ultimate Engineer (or Science Fair project). I'm not saying Sobottka did anything unethical or even that he is wrong, just that NOMA continues to live because there are still unknown and unknowable Truths.

If quantum mechanics is truly the embodiment of consciousness then EAM is the Truth by definition. Thus the larger the superposition, the faster it will undergo OR, and vice versa. Diana cuts in, telling people not to treat the green issue as special interest; no-one is an expert at the moment. Surely a creation like this is worth a blue ribbon. Assume both retrocausality and interconnected quantum effects

The tendency to reject retrocausality is due to a presumption of a casual paradox. time is just another dimension of space-time. Nobody is an expert, what’s needed is naivety to fuel innovation

Come listen to more inspiring speakers at the PSFK Conference Los Angeles on September 18 2007 in West Hollywood - psfkla.eventbrite.com.

A Third Choice (ID Hypothesis)

[Here is a guest post from TT member, Thought Provoker]

Front Loading is a popular hypothesis among the earnest ID scientists.

So what forces quantum states to be what they objectively reduce to? The two polarizations should be independent of each other but they are not. Each observer has a choice of which polarized state to measure (linear or circular). The observer isn't acting random.
God plays a particularly mean game of billiards. Despite at this level of understanding it is impossible to tell if the origin of this non-locality is a genuine quantum effect, our experimental data seem to strongly suggest that biological systems present non-local properties not explainable by classical models.

Chapter 4 - The Third Choice

Enstien once remarked "God doesn't play dice." TT's Joy has expanded that to "God does not play dice. Penrose has proposed an experiment FELIX in an attempt to test this hypothesis.

Even if Penrose is wrong about the details there is a threshold where quantum effects appear to give way to Newtonian physics. Superluminality is a problem because it inherently implies retrocausality.

The Third Choice offers no benefit if it is just another metaphysical argument. Do you still think chance has anything to do with this? Quantum effects are clearly interconnected in space-time to all other quantum effects. Living things can satisfy the needs of quantum consistency in ways non-living things can't. www.hameroff.com is a good source for material on the Penrose/Hameroff model.

Here is a link to an experiment trying to verify Penrose/Hameroff…

In recent times the interest for quantum models of brain activity has rapidly grown. A rock has little use for such a thing. She also championed the need to put marketing and corporate responsibility (C.R.) together. Assume a metaphysical construct (Multi-world interpretation)
3.

Can we separate the metaphysical from science? Past, present and future are all interconnected. Introduction by Josephine Fawkes.

Independent worldview (though that’s my favourite paper - I’m not sure I see that view ever truly happening).She then asks a question to the panel: Are agencies and corporations being shaped by consumers?John steps up to the plate - apparently, there was a study in Marketing Week which stated that of the top 5 polluters, 4 of those are aviators, and John believes (much like Russell, if I recall correctly) that this isn’t a brand issue - that the public will shape perceptions of these companies themselves. This is mainstream’s "supernatural".

Retrocausalty alone isn’t enough to explain design. Because sharing and recycling is the new Sexy black as I mentioned back here.

Tamara Giltsoff also chimed in with a similarly reasoned argument that a new sustainable business model is emerging and that its a front end change that we should be putting our marketing brain cells to, not short sharp shock. With quantum mechanics, that isn’t a problem. Would be nice, albeit a bit strange. With my cynical hat on, I wonder - do I want to be consulted about a company’s packaging decision? One experimentally observable answer is consistency with multiple observers. The timing for objective reduction, T = ĥ/E, is something that can be tested and, undoubtedly, will be tested. Nice idea, and one I think will happen. Observation forces the issue. While some physicists do not like this model because of what follows, it is the best game in town. However, living organisms contain microtubules that are very active with quantum effects.

Here is a link to a film clip that is a compelling argument all by itself.

Here is a link to a film clip of a neuron.

Chapter 6 - NOMA or OMA?

Gould's Non-overlapping Magisteria will always be a source of conflict. If it can be done, God or a mindless universe has all the tools it needs with quantum mechanics. Hameroff to produce the Penrose/Hameroff model of consciousness (Orch OR). Money and Green are not incommensurate, and one idea I liked was the movement to get children walking to school with a kagoul brand perhaps getting involved. Click to play" title="Click to play" border="0" width="300" />
Click To Play

Main Notes (by William Humphrey)

Karen frames the debate by imagining a world where consumers can see what companies are up to - how they are trying to become more green. The situation is too tightly controlled. To wiggly, squiggly organic things it gives them an edge in the evolutionary process. It has been understood since the 1930s that quantum mechanics expresses “quantum weirdness” which is more formally known as the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) paradox. The designer-centric answer is “the designer did it”. Are Penrose's instincts correct that he solved the aperiodic tiling problem instinctually instead of algorithmically?

Chapter 3 - Penrose/Hameroff (Orch OR)

For the OR model, Penrose is pretty much in his element. (RLX).

It doesn't matter which observer is the odd-man-out or in which order the observations are made. There are no discontinuities because the non-algebraic "equations" don't provide for it. If we don’t, we get fired.

But when you talk with people like John, Tamara and Johnny and start to think about the world that we live in, it gets a bit more complicated. 3. People will have to deal with issues like waste management in the future.

Karen then asks - what should agencies do? We are working out where these ideas will come from online - after all, 5.6m people are on Freecycle.

Tamara discusses Zopa, and how web 2.0 can help cut out systems of commerce that have been in place for centuries. This get’s into the Schrodinger’s cat paradox. Which quickly leads to the concept of universal consistency of all objective reductions. God plays a particularly mean game of billiards."

God doesn't play dice because there are no dice.

Imaging playing a dice game on an algorithmic computer that uses a pseudorandom number generator to decide which numbers come up. Which forces RRY as the answer. For example, a soft retrocasual example would be the action of someone taking an umbrella out of the closet and carrying it before it rains. But I can't know since I have nothing to compare it to even if I did, I wouldn't be able to fully appreciate either. But a lot depends on the media and how much they choose to maintain focus.

Job of designers & marketers is to create an intuitive connection & positivity around things that today are awkward - to break through and overcome fundamental myths that are preventing take-up of some solutions (eg: composting toilets, methane fuelled power)

At the moment, “green” is in the equivalent clumsy stage of digital in 1995… Green is also like digital in that it’s a pervasive issue

Sustainability programmes in companies don’t always have to be only for altruistic reasons - eg: GE does it to force the pace of regulation on standards etc and thus drive out their competition

“Gcommerce” - eg: Freecycle. Either way, we will never know.
I am content with understanding, and being impressed by, the invention. Schrodinger’s cat) would reach OR threshold in only 10-37 seconds. — he can’t see green being part of a mainstream agency, there’s a need for breakaways, just as happened with digital

Diana Verde Nieto (Clownfish)

• Green isn’t about charity, it’s economic. And there have been experiments that have produced some intriguing results.

  While he has made some mistakes, they were minor and the Penrose OR model is going strong, IMO. At this point, I wanted to speak up, and make the point about Second Life avatars and the average Brazillian, but I guess I was wise to keep it quiet…John’s chock full of stats, even off the top of his head.

  John proposes that green is beyond what people want - it’s more needs based in the future. Penrose's Orch OR model is practically running DNA processing according to Hameroff.

  Another point that transcends metaphysical interpretation. This is the designer-centric 'planning". With our mental, physical and global reality in flux, it’s only natural we will look for markers to make sense of it all.

Charles Frith’s made this review:

The PSFK conference last Friday held a panel to discuss the topic with Karen Fraser from The Ethical Index chairing the discussion with John Grant (Greenormal), Diana Verde Nieto (Clown Fish) and Tamara Giltsoff (Ozolab). Through non-deterministic NON-RANDOM quantum weirdness. One to sell our clients products and services and the other to build sustainability into the way they work. It really is as simple as that.

John Grant kicked off and although we’ve met in firstlife and talked bundles on his greenormal blog I only realised at the PSFK gig why he really does kick ass. But what happens if the first two observer’s measurements are horizontal polarization (X) and the third observer chooses to also measure linear polarization?

Let’s work with what we know. Setting new standards - be they labels or publishing a manifesto - for the consumer to follow/judge them on. It’s paramount that people realise that there will be things that they won’t be comfortable with, like the debate about fortnightly bin collections. The question that the Green Panel was debating was whether advertising agencies were being left behind in pushing this debate on. Quantum mechanics is part of all matter that make up the universe. Penrose OR is currently being tested.

link

Penrose's suggests that objective reduction does, in fact, create reality (at least as real as "reality" gets). If we don't that we have to decide which version of the OMA Truth (capital "T") is reality. We don't see the same quantum weirdness with throwing baseballs around as we do with throwing electrons around.

While this simplifies the situation for Schrödinger's cat it has the potential of complicating things for smaller objects like Tubular Dimers. around the globe since he practices what he preaches and only flies when only absolutely necessary. People think experientially, and we are all learning at the moment. Naturally occurring aperiodic crystals that matched Penrose Tilings.

Penrose claims that his ability, as a mathematician, to conceptualize non-algorithmic things is inconsistent with a computer only capable of algorithmic processing. However if you do check out one website to wet the whistle and that John has championed before, take a look at freecycle. No, not really - but I suppose, it’d be nice to be asked.

The first bit of weirdness is that if two circular measurements are made, the results will determine the linear polarization of the remaining photon. So far, no experimental result has managed to falsify it. The game is rigged. Life is a natural outcome of enabling quantum mechanics. The Penrose-Hameroff model assumes that microtubules inside neurons are responsible for quantum computation inside brain. It is also possible that a designer got to choose. There are no dice. I find it ironic that people rationalize that Penrose’s ideas about consciousness are totally disconnected from his brilliant work as a physicist. People will need to live in bigger cities. Pseudorandomness could be used to simulate anything from a dice game to an evolutionary process occurring over billions of years. Quantum consistency includes the past being consistent with the future. However, the ideas are experimentally verifiable. It is just quantum weirdness being consistent with itself. Even though this game could still be enjoyed by humans incapable of calculating the next number, it is not really random. The OR model is quantifiable and can be verified experimentally. All of the mixed observations possibilities are…

RRY YRR RYR
RLX XRL RXL
LLY YLL LYL
LRX XLR LXR

XXL XLX LXX
XYR XRY RXY
YYL YLY LYY
YXR YRX RYX

So far this doesn't exhibit anything like retrocausual or superluminal weirdness. Mathematically, it was shown that it is possible to completely cover a two dimensional plane with a distinct set of shapes ("tiles") and not end up with a repeating pattern (“aperiodic”). It bothered me when I first read it. Casual paradoxes can't happen.

The difficulty with interconnected, non-local quantum effects is that is sounds too magical and occurs faster than the speed of light. However, according to Penrose, such separations are unstable and will reduce at an objective threshold, hence avoiding multiple universes.

The threshold for Penrose OR is given by the indeterminacy principle E=ħ/t, where E is the gravitational self-energy (i.e. I worry that for they most part we probably are.

The AdLads summed their key learnings as:

• We need to embrace sustainability.
• Every client/product/brand wants to be seen to be doing something green, but most don’t know what to do.
• We live in an era where the macro-economical environment dictates changes that are almost being thrust upon advertisers.
• To be successful in communicating the message of green, the product must use itself to communicate a bigger issue, and please, please don’t patronize me.
• Being green can be broadly seen as a 3 step process, set new standards, collaborate with the consumer and help them live and feel better.

Helen Taylor commented:

Then came the Marketing Gap in Green panel which was all too short, but enough to really unsettle us and place what Amelia smartly calls the elephant in the room.

Hemal at The Eightfold wrote:

“We are creating the skin of culture…We need to create an intuitive connection with things that are radical.” — John Grant, BrandTarot. There are only a limited number of answers to this paradox..,

1. It wouldn't be actually random, just a simulation of randomness.
Is there such a thing as "natural" randomness?

Leaving living things out of the picture for the moment, any inorganic randomness can be traced to quantum mechanics and quantum mechanics isn't random. IOW, there can be explanations that can't be explained. He notes that, the Body Shop aside, there are very few truly green brands.Diana holds that it’s not about charity - it’s about making money, and that marketeers could fall prey to the ‘Glass House’ supposition. A designer-centric term for this would be “planned”. This is not an experimental error. Quantum mechanics has been sewn into the very fabric of what make living things appear to be acting randomly.

Observation doesn't cause "random" objective reduction. John talks coherently in compelling joined up paragraphs and really could use an hour or two on his own to take us through a journey from sinners-in-denial to messianic converts. This makes complete sense for those who follow geopolitics around the globe and is a timely reminder for Sci-fi fans to reread Dune. Whether these scientists refer to it by name or just in general concepts, they are looking for the answer to ID’s “innocuous question” by searching for biological solutions that presume later biological needs. Greener brands are helping to edit choice

Technology is part of the problem because of the cost of energy in connecting to the internet

Communications agencies should be mediators, getting client marketing departments to talk to their CSR departments

Eg: of Ariel 30… didn’t change the product at all, just promoted washing it at 30 degrees which saves a lot of energy

Carbon footprint is the big issue now; Water toxicity is the next big issue

She hates carbon offsetting calling it the “morning after pill of environmentalism”

Re: what should agencies do? What’s wrong is how much people are made aware - Second Life uses a lot of electricity. However, Penrose’s ideas about consciousness are meeting fierce resistance. Too true - you seem to read a different statistic every day.

For Diana, being naive is a big part of learning, and leading to improvement. A Mandelbrot Set appears to be chaotic and "random" yet exposes patterns and design. For all that we work in a creative business, at the end of the day our job it to connect people and brands and in the process sell our clients products. Our creative end products (ie, advertising in all its forms - direct, digital, TVCs) help to faciliate a relentless culture of continual consumption and the creation of an un-ending desire for new “stuff.” But how sustainable is this in the long-term?

The elephant in the room for me is, how can we marry together ethics and a concern for a sustainable and healthy future with a “we sell or else…” philosophy?

I suppose the answer, in as much as there ever is ‘an answer”, is that we at agencies have the opportunity to represent the views of the consumer and to ensure that ethical, sustainable marketing ideas and practices are not only things that live in a CSR department.

Don't living things act randomly?

That pool shooting hustler pulled a fast one there. She also drew our attention to London’s aim to be a sustainable city by 2020 which was something I wasn’t aware of and will surely be a terrific motivator for business to reshape and retool. — Don’t treat it as special interest, that’s why the environmental movement failed. We also need an organizing process or agency. Which means Y would be the expected linear polarization in the case of XX?.

Classically, the answer must be XXY. OOL becomes easy to explain. Dembski can talk about Universal Probability Bounds all he wants, but unless it is absolutely impossible, God can not only make the shot, she can do it in such a way you won't be able to tell she did it much less how.

And, oh yeah. If Alice measures a clockwise (R) polarization and Bob also measures clockwise (R) polarization then Cecilia will ALWAYS measure a vertical (Y) polarization if she chooses to measure linear polarization. For the Third Choice model I suggest “retrocausal” (a generalized observation of an action occurring before a cause.) While “retrocausal” normally implies time travel, we need a looser definition due to the lack of appropriate candidates in the English language. Assume interconnected, non-local quantum effects
5. Our experimental set-up is made by two separated and completely shielded basins where two parts of a common human DNA neuronal culture are monitored by EEG. All of the panelists agree, and it’s time for the next talk..

Audience Comments

Amelia Torode had this serious reaction to the talk:

It was Tamara and John Grant on the Green Marketing Panel and Johnny Vulkan from Anomaly that made me actively stop and question rather than just passively sit and think. It could be explained classically (algorithmic and static states). Well, I’d answer that one by claiming that the punters you are trying to reach do know how recycle/do more, and that they’ll be flogged things.

Las Vegas podcast #126 includes:

• Take 5 opening clip
• Exploring America’s casinos
• Harrah’s North Kansas City
• Harrah’s Council Bluffs
• Horseshoe Council Bluffs
• A few trip photos
• Tangents about the Omaha Beef, Sonic, guys wearing overalls and more
• Listener calls about Bouchon at Venetian, Love at Mirage, Red Rock Resort and Casino, deals at Travelzoo, Iron Man filming at Caesars, another free drink offer, Signature at MGM, Olives at Bellagio and more

Direct download of the podcast: Five Hundy By Midnight 7/8/07 (53:02 min, 48.7 MB) or subscribe.

The Marketing Gap in Green panel at the PSFK Conference London

This 50 minute video from the PSFK Conference London 2007 presents Karen Fraser (Ethical Index) chairing a panel with Tamara Giltsoff (OZOlab), John Grant (BrandTarot) and Diana Verde Nieto (Clownfish). I think he’s a national asset and at some point the British should collectively chip in to give him our spare carbon points because we need him out on the road and ‘representing’ for the U.K. When life needed a randomizer, where do you think she got one? Penrose has a suggested answer for the paradox.

Chapter 2 – Penrose OR

The Penrose has a model is called OR (objective reduction)…

Penrose considered superposition as a separation in underlying reality at its most basic level, the Planck scale. I will explain both of these in the light of the new Third Choice.

A predetermined Universe would be like a cosmic Mandelbrot Set. He did talk about how the green (sustainable living) movement is in its early stages right now like digital was in 1995, and that there’s a real opportunity for all marketing folk to get into this and start changing the senseless waste of that indulgent age ‘The Consumer Society’ and make good money out of it. She uses an invisible cue stick inscribed with the words "quantum weirdness". Past, present, future is all fixed and consistent with itself. If the human race can make a global business out of something like World Wrestling, Hello Magazine and Blue Tooth Headgear for anyone other than taxi drivers then I’m sure we can make a buck from shifting something not from A to B, but say from A to C. The first part on the Penrose/Hameroff model depends on Penrose's theories concerning objective reduction. Several experiments seem to indicate that EPR-like correlations are possible at the biological level. How do brands make it tangible, how do they show they’re making these decisions?

Most of public aren’t thinking “how can I do better”, more “I’m feeling a bit guity - do whatever you can to make me not feel bad”… What’s needed is reframing - not about making less guilty, more just a “nicer and better way”

Agrees with John that News Corp are a great example… BSkyB were years ahead on their corporate framework, so now in good position to focus on the consumer side.

Re: what should agencies do? In over 70 years and countless experiments science is forced to conclude something fundamental has to give. The universe is totally interconnected at the quantum level.

It is impossible for one observer to see Schrödinger's cat dead while another one sees it alive so the paradox is prevented from happening in the first place. And his Penrose Tilings was just something he did as a hobby.

This chapter deals with subjects that Penrose admits could be totally wrong but, in his opinion, are more likely correct than not. Personally, I am taking the more modest approach of assuming consciousness is just an artifact of quantum mechanics. It provides some value to quasicrystals. She backs up this point by emphasising a choice benefit from the supermarkets - women were the first to go for organic food, and they make the purchasing decisions in the typical household.

Tamara comes back to the paradox of marketing and advertising promoting green issues. The more I understand the more I am impressed. However, this presentation is old and Hameroff has mostly taken over explaining the biological explanation.

Experimentally, the answer is XXX!

Quantum mechanics gives the opposite result of what classical physics would dictate. 2. With that, we can figure out the circular polarizations of the other two photons (they would be R) because XRL and RXL are the only alternatives that fit.

Therefore, we have an RR? I’m all for this; I hope the local Londis can spark a revival of sorts (albeit with MUCH better advertising).

Karen wants to know just what it is consumers want, having overheard Tamara’s point about packaging, and how you’d rethink convenience over ethics - essentially, people don’t like too much packaging, but sometimes it is essential…when do the two converge?

John holds that people just want to be involved. A solution that Penrose claims couldn't have been accomplished without the aid of a non-algorithmic process (pseudorandomness isn't sufficient).

It might be tempting to dismiss this as just a mathematical exercise and, therefore, not "reality". John opened with some breaking market research that aviation brands are the new dirty word. Can we anticipate a renaissance for the great British seaside holiday and the rise of the guest house again? How? Tying quantum superposition to general relativity, he identified superposition as spacetime curvatures in opposite directions, hence a separation in fundamental spacetime geometry. Actually I was pretty much floored by the release of the Stern Review Report on climate change which I had no expectation to see in my lifetime. Its not exactly rocket science is it? Not only can't we verify the existence of either her or her cue stick, we aren't even allowed to see the balls until they "poof" into existence right before our eyes via objective reduction.
Dr. I like Zopa, and really wish I’d have talked about it in various client meetings - ah well, it’s one for another day. Collaborating with the customer, not merely selling to them - ie the Ikea Cagoule design (I can’t find this one on the web, for some reason). If God needs to, she can reverse cause and effect, retrocausality.

Chapter 5 - DNA, RNA and Microtubules

Here is a Hameroff discussion titled Quantum Computing in DNA

Hypothesis: DNA utilizes quantum information and quantum computation for various functions. Lastly Diane used a bleak euphemism for the business of carbon offset trading described as the equivalent for the environment of the morning after pill

Lynette Webb made these notes:

Karen Fraser (Ethical Index & the Fraser Consultancy) - moderator

• Envision a future where consumers are able to specify their ethical/sustainable preferences in what they buy - more subtle than boycotts
• One third of people talk about ethical issues surrounding brands with their friends

John Grant (BrandTarot)

• 4 out of top 5 “eco-unfriendly” brands named in recent survey were aviation… Aviation is this summer’s 4×4
• Green marketing isn’t about creating green brands.
• Green issue isn’t going to go away if there’s a recession; the same as health issues for people don’t go away. If there is an inventor, I think it is a reasonable assumption that this is the best way to show our appreciation. Just the way of the world - you almost can’t help being mildly hypocritical.

  Diana then moves on to state that the governmental perspective on the overall green issue has been very confused, and that the green issue has been largely driven by women. An isolated one kilogram object (e.g. A hard retrocausual example would be precognition. At least none we can see. I’m not sure….

  John discusses the importance of thinking globally and acting locally - supporting local produce and shopping at the local corner shop, citing farmers markets and the like to support his statement. Again they are not incommensurate but it takes a twin track mind to handle the conflict in the transition stage. I feel the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states presents the fundamental issues the clearest.

  Imagine we have three observers (Alice, Bob and Cecilia) ready to measure entangled photons that head out in three different directions; One to Alice, another to Bob and a third to Cecilia. Penrose points to aperiodic tiling for his non-algorithmic explanation. Which brings me on to my “elephant in the room”…

  What is the purpose of the industry that we are in?

  Having spent years at Ogilvy, I was always taught it’s “we sell or else…“. Our main experimental result is that, under stimulation of one culture by means of a 630 nm laser beam at 300 ms, the cross-correlation between the two cultures grows up at maximum levels. Ask them, and you shall receive your answer. Also, Water will be the next big ussue not only because of toxicity but also because it’s most likely to start wars

• News Corporation is a great example of an organisation being transformed - giving lightbulbs to offset; now championing no power standby
• Re: what should agencies do? Working with an insurance company on developing a system where people could lend each other good they don’t need that often (eg: power drill)
• “Local” is going to be a big issue for supermarkets in the next year or two. Ignore it
  2. Small superpositions, e.g. We know if the observer measured circular polarization the answer would be counterclockwise (L as in XXL). John holds that there will be niche ‘green’ agencies, much like digital is now. We need to urgently be speaking to each other because doing good is actually something that sets products and services apart. The panel set out to examine if marketing departments and their agencies get left behind by both the corporations they serve and the consumers they supply? How long before we have floods of questions, and things become the question age…?

  John follows that up by contesting that there is very little evidence to suggest that consumers require incentivisation any more. The universe just is.

  God is an equally valid as a metaphysical model, IMO…

  I can easily hold the notion that the universe is the Ultimate Invention of the Ultimate Engineers. However, a decade after Penrose demonstrated his Penrose Tilings mineralogists discovered quasicrystals. But would I use it? Diana immediately answers, telling them to embrace day to day sustainability, Carbon Footprints and the cost per employee. Time travel/retrocausality can and does happen but it doesn't cause a conflict because the whole Mandelbrot picture is unchanging. Therefore, we can live with multiple Truths.

  Sobottka made a good stab at presenting a verifiable, single OMA truth based on this model. I think of quantum mechanics as a non-deterministic, non-algorithmic, non-local process. Therefore, we will forge ahead and presume the quantum effects are really real.

  But what is the reality if a quantum state is never observed? For this non-engineer, I sometimes refer to it as a Supernatural Science Fair Project. the degree of spacetime separation given by the superpositioned mass), ħ is Planck’s constant over 2π, and t is the time until OR occurs.

  Rocks aren't very efficient at doing whatever the universe need done. Not so long back I took some time out to study a bit about propaganda because it seemed obvious to me that there was no way that after the failure of Kyoto and the growth of China and India that the neoliberal capitalist model was going to rein in the excesses of marketing communications credo of sell more despite it ‘getting hot in here’ (so take off all your clothes). an electron separated from itself, if isolated from environment would require 10 million years to reach OR threshold. No - in an ideal world, he’d encourage mobile phone companies to halve their fees per month, but have a minimum of a four year contract per person. The past is interwoven with the future. In addition Diane pointed out the Ariel low temperature wash cycle campaign(30 degrees) and that the internet is a heavy user of electricity impacting on the environment through huge data centers that are sprouting up around the world, as well as the costly running of computers and servers. Not sure when, but I find myself nodding and agreeing with it.

  Diana pipes up; people want to be rewarded and made to feel happy in her view - to be given an objective and an opportunity to do good. If the cat lives or dies based on a quantum state, is the cat both dead and alive (superposition) pending an observation? In other words, Orchestrated Objective Reduction or “Orch OR” for short.

  Kurt Gödel's incompleteness theorems supports the possibility of non-algorithmic things existing in nature. It is just non-deterministic.

  Quantum weirdness defies algorithmic explanation. Assume retrocausality
  4. This is a real paradox. But what about the fine tuning argument? Via quantum mechanics of course. The Third Choice involves interconnected quantum effects.

  Chapter 1 – Quantum Weirdness is real

  Quantum mechanics is the foundation of all matter, living or not. A mainstream scientific term would be “supernatural”. What happens if you kill your ancestors? Fair point, and nicely put.

  John believes you need 3 things for sustainable marketing - being ‘green’ means 3 things have to happen: 1. I did like the way that Tamara implied that SUV’s were now approaching the social pariah status of something like a Chavmobile.

  Diane Verde Nieto of Clownfish made a great observation for those in attendance, that modern communications professionals should be able to handle the schizophrenia of leading two agendas. Flying seemed to lose its sex appeal around about the time Pan Am were shot out of the sky in 1991, but its official now; only losers and drink drivers fly unnecessarily.

  I urge you to buy John’s about to be published book The Green Marketing Manifesto when it comes out, for all the juicy bits about how to do green marketing. Fair point there; how the hell can you preach green issues and yet be trying to sell stuff? Superpositions of dipole states of base pairs consisting of purine (A,G) and pyrimidine (C,T) ring structures play the role of qubits, and quantum communication (coherence, entanglement, non-locality) occur in the “pi stack” region of the DNA molecule.

Whether we are talking about a theist's pool shooting God or an atheist's universe just forcing consistency. This is not a logic error. (RRY)

If Alice measures a clockwise (R) polarization and Bob measures a counterclockwise (L) polarization then Cecilia will measure a horizontal (X) polarization if she chooses to measure linear polarization. situation. If anyone could translate quantum weirdness into reality, it would be a man who models Black Holes for a living (along with Hawking). I found this 1999 presentation where Penrose explains his chain of logic from basic physics to microtubules. Having new systems in place such as lending goods and libraries, helping us live better - and this notion comes from web 2.0. Penrose figured out two shapes that solved this puzzle. In the past year , a very intensive experimental work about this subject has been done at DiBit Labs in Milan, Italy by our research group. This universe may be the only Mandelbrot Set that works. There is no such thing as randomness just forced consistency. If you picture the universe from outside space-time you would see time as just another dimension, therefore the universe is unchanging. — teamwork (talk to NGO’s etc

Tamara Giltsoff (OZObrand)

• Green marketing isn’t a trend, it’s moving to a sustainable new approach to doing business
• You can’t decouple environmental issues from social change because you’re affecting the way people live, eat, etc.
• “Conspicuous organics” - people who don’t always go organic but do for dinner parties
• Not everything has to be about selling new “product”… there is also room for innovation in service; “see the world through a service paradigm”.
• Look behind any product, where can you express values throughout? European Travel Cruise Vacation Holiday Villas Hawaii Travel Cruise Review Family Vacations